Perioperative X-rays in arthroplasty surgery: outcome and cost.

نویسندگان

  • C J Lavernia
  • R A Hernandez
  • J A Rodriguez
چکیده

Numerous legislative proposals to cut reimbursement to surgeons and hospitals are presently included in U.S. congressional and senate agendas. Perioperative x-ray films in arthroplasty surgery are standard operating procedure. Our objective was to assess the effects of the radiologist reading on the clinical and economic outcome of arthroplasty procedures. One hundred consecutive cases were prospectively studied. The radiologist reading, clinical management, and outcome of each case were carefully reviewed. The amount billed for the radiologist interpretation was noted for each examination. A total of 398 studies in 100 patients were done. Ninety-six preoperative, 110 intraoperative, and 192 postoperative radiographic studies were reviewed. These reports took an average of 1.71 days to be recorded on the chart (SD +/- 2.45). The total radiologic professional fees billed to Medicare in these cases was $11,054. (The radiologist's interpretation was not useful in the clinical management and did not affect the outcome in any case.) Assuming that each surgeon takes 1 x-ray film on every arthroplasty case, the total actual savings to Medicare of not having a radiologist reading these studies could reach $536,000 per year; if 2 intrahospital x-ray studies are performed per procedure (preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative), the savings are $1.1 million per year. These cost reductions are achieved at no sacrifice to quality of care or outcome. Numerous areas of excessive spending with no improvement in outcome exist in the treatment of Medicare patients. There areas should be identified and eliminated before surgical fees are lowered even further.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Retention of Prior Hardware Material: What is the Outcome?

Background: There is an information gap in literature regarding postoperative outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA)in patients with hardware in-situ from the previous knee surgery. The present study aims to evaluate impact of retainedhardware on short-term outcome of TKA patients.Methods: Perioperative radiographs of patients who had undergone TKA between 2007 and 2012 were reviewedand patie...

متن کامل

The Perioperative Impact of Surgical Case Order in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine a correlation between surgical case order and the length ofoperative time, total length of time in the operating room, time until discharge from the hospital, and the incidence ofintraoperative complications for primary total shoulder arthroplasty cases.Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of records for all individual primary tota...

متن کامل

Significance of Perioperative Tests to Diagnose the Infection in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of perioperative tests for the diagnosis of infectionin revision shoulder arthroplasty.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 537 shoulder arthroplasties (429 patients) that underwent revisionshoulder arthroplasty at our institution. Periprosthetic tissue cultures were positive in 169/537 surgeries.Results: White-blood ...

متن کامل

Protocols for Management of Underserved Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty: A National Survey of Safety Net Hospitals

Background: Although it has been shown that perioperative protocols enhance arthroplasty care and safety, it isnot known how prevalent their use is in safety net hospitals, which operate with a mandate to treat the poor andunderserved. Understanding the elements currently included in standard perioperative arthroplasty protocols at variousinstitutions may help guide future interventions and pol...

متن کامل

The “July Effect” on Shoulder Arthroplasty: Are Complication Rates Higher at the Beginning of the Academic Year?

Background: The ”July effect” is a colloquialism asserting an increased rate of errors at the start of the academicyear in teaching hospitals. This retrospective population-based study evaluated for the presence of the July effect inperforming shoulder arthroplasty.Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 2002 through 2011, a total of 178,590 patients undergoingshoulder arthroplasty a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Journal of arthroplasty

دوره 14 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999